10 sick with E. coli O157: Link to raw milk in California

The Spongebob cone of silence – usually reserved for leafy greens, cantaloupes and sometimes tomatoes has finally been lifted on an E. coli O157 outbreak involving raw milk in California.

colbert.raw.milkRobert Rodriquez of The Fresno Bee reports Organic Pastures Dairy in Fresno County voluntarily recalled its raw milk last month after internal tests found evidence of E. coli. The tainted milk caused at least 10 illnesses, with six of those victims reporting they drank Organic Pastures raw milk, said California Department of Public Health officials.

The victims all had closely related strains of E. coli O157, the health department said.

Dairy owner Mark McAfee said that in early January the company voluntarily recalled the milk within 36 hours of determining the presence of E. coli.

McAfee said the cow had E. coli from a rare form of mastitis, an inflammation of the mammary gland in a cow’s udder.

Once the milk was found to be contaminated, the dairy stopped making milk and recalled the product. McAfee said only two of the dairy’s 40 routes – Northern California and the Central Coast – got the bad milk.

The dairy has since resumed milk production.

McAfee said the dairy has been talking with the families of some of those made ill from the milk. Of the victims – McAfee said there are only five – one is a 3-year-old from Fresno and the other is a 13-year-old from the Solvang area.

The two young victims were hospitalized and later released.

spongebob.oil.colbert.may3.10“We own this,” McAfee said. “We are in discussions over taking care of the medical costs for the child in Fresno and the one on the coast. We take this very seriously.”

McAfee said the child in Fresno drank contaminated milk purchased from the store on the dairy’s property near Kerman.

On Feb. 9, McAfee said, “Our food safety program saved the day. It worked extremely well. We’re proud of that.”

Not sure the 10 with E. coli O157 feel that way.

  • Christian

    “the company voluntarily recalled the milk within 36 hours of determining the presence of E. coli.”

    wait…what? It took three days to recall the contaminated milk?!
    I know E. coli could be present at acceptable lower levels, but that seems quite long to start the recall

  • Gordon S Watson

    perhaps you can explain how this batch of raw milk is responsible for sickening 10 people, when only 6 of them drank it. The logic escapes me. Does it not occur that there’s another factor common to all 10?